Friday, October 24, 2008

Looking Through Your Customers' Eyes

Following is another excerpt from my forthcoming book, The Business of Relationships. It deals with one of the most important qualities of successful long-term relationships of every sort. Having perspective is key to achieving balance and a sense of purpose in your relationships. This quote from Tom Peters offers a sound business principle that can be easily adapted to your personal relationships as well. I hope you enjoy it...


“The challenge is to view every element of every operation through the customer's lens, to constantly attempt to redefine each element of the business in terms of the customer's perceptions.” - Tom Peters

Tom Peters is an author and consultant who became one of the first business guru-celebrities with the publication of his book In Search of Excellence in 1982 followed by a series of PBS programs featuring him as host. His early career included stints with the Department of Defense and as a senior White House drug abuse advisor during the Nixon administration. He worked as a management consultant wih McKinsey & Company, eventually becoming a partner before leaving to form his independent practice in 1981. Peters is the author of 14 best-selling books including Thriving on Chaos, The Pursuit of WOW!, Leadership and The New World of WOW. He still maintains an active speaking and writing regimen and, while previous works emphasized empowerment and problem-solving methodologies, his recent books emphasize personal responsibility as a core trait for surviving in the new economy.

Peters was a dynamic presenter and proponent of the 'quality' initiatives of the early 1980's and his first book certainly is grounded in that philosophy. To have a quote that recognizes the importance of viewing all your operations through the customer's eyes and experiences certainly is not surprising. In fact, the customer-centric or customer-intimate model is even today one of the three organizational models or stances (operational efficiency and innovation are the others) that businesses espouse. It is also not too difficult for me to see how this customer-intimate model can also apply to relationships.

Think of those important people again... your kids, spouse, colleagues, parents, friends, lovers and partners. They are your customers. In every sense of the word, they are consumers and, hopefully, repeat buyers as well. They consume what you have to offer. So what is it that you're offering? What is your 'business' providing to your 'customers'? Is it understanding and compassion? Is it empathy and assurance? Is it support and love? Or is it indifference and judgmentalism? Is it blame and criticism? Is it anger and withdrawal? Does your business function in a way that makes your customers want to return?

We could fill shelves with all the books written recently about the new power of consumers. Take their central ideas and they all say the same thing - The Customer is Number One! Look at your important relationships the same way. Peters says to look “through the customer's lens” and “redefine each element of the business.” I need to look inward and make sure that what I'm offering puts my customer first . I have to be committed to the extra effort. It doesn't mean that I'm a pushover, wimp, doormat or milk-toast but I have to get outside of myself to make sure my customers are happy. It certainly doesn't mean that my 'return policy' has no boundaries but I must be sensitive in dealing with issues that are important to them. If your customers are important, that's what you do.

The old saying goes, “It's a lot easier to sell more to an existing customer than to find a new one.” I know that I struggle daily to put my most important 'customers' first but I sure don't want to have to hunt for new ones either. So, for me, I'll try to take a few minutes to productively work through a teenager's tantrum. I'll listen empathetically to my wife instead of short-circuiting conversation to diagnose and fix what I think is the problem. I'll offer support before advice to a colleague who is going through a divorce. As Tom Peters emphasizes personal responsibility being critical to success in the new economy, it should also be key to personal relationships. Hopefully, it will be a key perspective for you as well.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Friday, October 3, 2008

Haste Makes Waste: Old Advice, New Application

This past week, I took some time to consider the broader implications of the bailout bill that passed the Senate in an end-run vote on Wednesday night. Basically our Senators, knowing that approval in their chamber was a foregone conclusion, decided to sweeten the bill rejected on Monday by the House in order to entice Representatives to pass it the second time around. It was also a bold-faced attempt to pressure legislators to pass the band-aid bailout quickly to avoid dire consequences in the markets. I believe that I can now comment on some of the developments with a little perspective gained through reflection on this complex issue.



First, I think it is foolish to assume that we are at the gates of hell and must do something - ANYTHING - to avoid certain disaster. It is true that banks' balance sheets are choking on bad debt, it's true banks are not lending each other (and us too) any money, and it's true that our financial markets are influencing those across the world. At the same time, however, start-up community banks are proliferating, offering commercial and residential financing at aggressive rates to qualified customers. Bad banks (WaMu, Wachovia) and investment houses (Lehman, Bear Stearns) are being acquired by good ones (JP Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo). Unemployment remains manageable, inflation is in check and major economic indicators are stable. This sense of time running out is foolish. This is a problem that developed slowly and a comprehensive solution cannot be crafted overnight. As my grandmother often said, "If you don't have time to do it right, when will you have time to do it over?"



Second, to sweeten the bill with incentives like raising the FDIC deposit limits, adding tax breaks and including various pet programs is insulting to the American people and a denigration of the importance of this legislation. The add-ons provide no real benefits to the ordinary citizen or small business and increase the total cost of this bailout by almost 22%! This is truly "putting lipstick on a pig." Lest Senator McCain think about weighing in, this is not a comment on your choice for Vice President.



Third, there is broad acknowledgement that this is not a good plan but it is merely "the best we have." Wait a minute! Let's not forget that this is essentially the solution put forward by an Administration that gave us the crisis in the first place due to lax oversight and an emphasis on artificially inflating home values and overheating the market. It is the plan of an ultimate Wall Street insider and an academic given to comparisons with the Great Depression. It is the plan of an Administration that took a budget supplus of over a half-TRILLION dollars and turned it into a massive deficit in less than 36 months! It is also the plan that has been rejected by over 200 prominent economists in an open letter to the Treasury Secretary. It is a plan that ignores the recommendations of former high-level government and industry leaders.



Finally, there is no shortage of good ideas in the arena if we would only take the time to listen and build coalitions and consensus. George Soros, the billionaire investor and currency trader, says that an effective plan must address root problems in the housing market and stimulate appreciation, and this plan does not. Yale University economists have floated a plan to refinance mortgages for EVERY owner-occupied dwelling (not just those in foreclosure / pre-foreclosure) at a low-fixed rate backed by the government at far less cost than the bailout bill. Still other economists believe that the market can correct itself without any massive government intervention. They acknowledge that we must do SOMETHING to shore up the short-term lending that is the lifeblood of small businesses and large corporations alike but it falls far short of this rescue mission to nowhere. In fact, a simple solution may be to invest in these institutions through stock and warrant purchases and allow them to treat and/or dispose of these distressed assets in the normal course of business as values improve and markets recover.



America does not need a rush to judgment and a knee-jerk plan. We need the best and most diverse minds in government and the private sector to craft a comprehensive and workable plan to resolve the immediate circumstances and plan for the long-term health of our economy. We need to do this on an aggressive timetable with a great sense of urgency. We do not need to "blow up the dam" because a few boats sank on the lake. Unfortunately, by the time you read this we may have done just that. And our haste will surely make waste.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,